Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Percussive maintenance (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. L Faraone  01:23, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Percussive maintenance
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of notability, and not much more can be said about the topic than the one sentence already present. HGK745 (talk) 06:29, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to Wiktionary.  Erpert  Who is this guy? 06:58, 16 July 2013 (UTC)


 * delete Already transwikied according to the previous AFD, and there's no reason not to ratify the early action. Mangoe (talk) 12:27, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * If that's the case, maybe this should be speedily deleted then?  Erpert  Who is this guy? 17:17, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - a cute term, but no chance for an article to be more than a dicdef, possibly enhanced with "In popculture" section. However IMO the nominator is mistaken about notability of the concept itself. Staszek Lem (talk) 15:33, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:38, 16 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete as a dicdef of a slang term. -- Whpq (talk) 17:06, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Soft-redirect to Wiktionary. To aid readers, and to prevent re-creation (by letting editors see that only 1 sentence has ever been achieved for this regularly viewed topic). –Quiddity (talk) 20:06, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.