Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Percutane


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Jclemens (talk) 02:57, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Percutane

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Very spammish, and created by an SPA whose username is suggestive of the product's creator. I stopped short of DB-spam because the refs give some suggestion of notability. However, ref 1 reads like a press release, ref2 is unverifiable (paid archive service) leaving only the Herald article. I suspect a notable product would have made a few more news or magazine headlines in the ensuing 9 years, but all the leading google hits (heavily diluted due to the name being a synonym for percutaneous) are for vendors. dramatic (talk) 03:00, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. dramatic (talk) 03:01, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * delete - Spam of random product. It's not exactly Ajax (cleanser) - SimonLyall (talk) 03:12, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable product. No news articles in the English language can be found about the product, see . Bearian (talk) 20:35, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  23:41, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.