Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perdigueiro Galego


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 04:56, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Perdigueiro Galego

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Only a single source cited, could not find anything attributable on Google and as far as I can work out (their website has no search function I can find) this is not recognised by the Real Sociedad Canina de España (Spanish kennel club. I suspect this is a largely unknown localised breed, but without attributable RS it is TOOSOON. Cavalryman (talk) 04:37, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions.  J  947 &thinsp;(c) , at 04:45, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:23, 28 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. There is only one source for the "Portugese Galician" from which the entire article has come from, and that is the Galician Ministry for Agriculture. Although I assume that this is a reliable source, the article fails GNG because "multiple sources are generally expected". There are a number of websites that reflect what the Wikipedia article states, however these are unreliable.  William Harris Canis lupis track.svg talk Canis lupis track.svg 08:59, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - too early to be recognized as a breed, fails GNG and V - quite a few of these types of articles appear to be using WP to gain recognition for a beloved pet, or possibly for a new breed-type that is not yet proven to be purebred. When a reputable breed registry recognizes a new breed as purebred or accepts it into its FSS where credible records of ancestry, DNA testing, breeding records and breed standards are verifiable, there will be more RS writing about the breed. Until then, it is an unverifiable crossbreed, or mutt, but a loved one, nonetheless. Atsme Talk 📧 15:45, 2 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.