Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perfect Karma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, on top of the numerical advantage the delete arguments look stronger.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:27, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Perfect Karma

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article is totally unsourced. I doubt that "Perfect Karma" is actually a legitimate Buddhist or Hindu concept - for all the evidence in the article, the idea could even be a hoax. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 04:27, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 10:26, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Buddhism-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 10:26, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 10:26, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 10:26, 6 January 2014 (UTC)


 * delete per WP:TNT. I see uses of the phrase but not so that I am sure that an article could be written from them; however, what I find is certainly inconsistent with what this stub says. Mangoe (talk) 15:29, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Found over 400 results on books alone. The article has to be enlarged, I can do that. Bladesmulti (talk) 04:05, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 04:46, 14 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment The simple fact that the expression "Perfect Karma" can be found in sources does not indicate that there is actually a coherent subject than an article could be written about. Would Bladesmulti elaborate on why he thinks "Perfect Karma" is in fact a legitimate Hindu or Buddhist concept? FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 04:55, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Just a usual term, i guess. Bladesmulti (talk) 05:21, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Can you really come up with nothing better than that? It doesn't answer Mangoe's delete vote. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 19:21, 14 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Karma is a legitimate Hindu or Buddhist concept. Perfect Karma is neither a legitimate Hindu or Buddhist concept nor a well-known neologism. Redtigerxyz Talk 11:37, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * * Delete. Agree with User:Redtigerxyz. Preetikapoor0 (talk) 03:10, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.