Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perfect liberty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 01:55, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Perfect liberty
Obviously N POV, poorly written. Perhaps a redirect to liberty? Last Avenue 03:49, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I meant not NPOV, but as usual I tagged it NPOV. Thanks to Royboycrashfan for fixing it. Last Avenue 20:28, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Royboycrashfan 03:55, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. POV essay. -- Antaeus Feldspar 04:02, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete essay. Kusma (討論) 04:11, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Kusma. Extremely POV.  Wikipedia is not a sounding board, nor is it a place to publish the term paper topic that you've chosen.  --Kinu 04:33, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Joe 05:22, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's pretty foolish to publish an essay on Wikipedia; if they then published it elsewhere, it would seem like blatant plagarism. smurray  inch   e  ster  ( User ), ( Talk ) 10:27, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Information exchange, as well as new ideas/opinions, is perfect for encyclopedia enthusiast(s). When articles, such as this one, lack requisite structures, formats, etc. marking them as such is ample policing; at least until a more credible article is submitted. ledge
 * Delete. Preaky 17:32, 6 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.