Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perfect square factor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was redirect to Perfect square. howcheng  [ t &#149; c &#149; w &#149;  e  ] 17:40, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Perfect square factor
This article contains (almost) no information. It says that a perfect square factor is a factor that is a perfect square and it gives one example. It has no ingoing links from the main namespace and it was created on 26 September by an anonymous editor, so I don't see any potential for expansion. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 13:30, 6 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete - unnecessary article as both perfect square and divisor (factor) already have articles. The term "perfect square factor" comes up with regularity only when discussing simplifying square roots. B.Wind 04:54, 7 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Neutral - I've attempted to improve and wikify the article, but I don't feel strongly enough about its merit to vote keep. Gandalf61 10:14, 7 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. As mentioned there are articles on relevant concepts such as perfect square.  We can take any similar concept and make it a factor, e.g. triangular factor, pentagonal factor, etc., but they don't deserve their own pages.  The term perfect square factor is not of enough importance on its own merits.  --C S (Talk) 03:10, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Relisting this to generate more discussion. howcheng   [ t &#149; c &#149; w &#149;  e  ] 00:25, 13 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Redirect to perfect square. All of the relevant information should already be in there.  --Cyde Weys talkcontribs 00:27, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Cyde. Harro5 00:35, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Cyde YixilTesiphon Say hello 01:51, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect only because redirects are cheap. would say Delete otherwise novacatz 02:20, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete -- no significant infoirmational value.(Sorry to the author) --Simon Cursitor 08:20, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - are we going to have entries/redirects for even factor? odd factor? single-digit factor? Theres an infinite number of properties a factor could satisfy, and I don't see why any of them deserve an article or a redirect. --Pierremenard
 * Redirect per above. This term is regularly used, so it is reasonable to assume people typing this expect to be redirect. - Mgm|(talk) 10:34, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above. Tom Harrison (talk) 14:40, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to perfect square. KillerChihuahua?!? 15:30, 13 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Redirect implemented as per general consensus here. --Cyde Weys talkcontribs 15:33, 13 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.