Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perianne Boring


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Chamber of Digital Commerce. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:32, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Perianne Boring

 * – ( View AfD View log )

That article was sent to PROD for the following reason: ''notability not established, not sufficient reliable coverage for this beauty queen turned lobbyist. The Washington Times is local news, only covering her because she ran in DC. WUSA9 is also local news. The WUSA9 article contains no original research, basing primarily on an interview with her, it is not substantial coverage.'' The forbes source which was not criticized is WP:RS and therefore not worthy of a speedy deletion Comte0 (talk) 18:42, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Comte0 (talk) 18:54, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Comte0 (talk) 18:54, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 20:01, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 20:01, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 20:01, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 20:02, 24 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - not enough for notability. The Forbes piece reads like a subject-sourced blurb, functionally a press release, and this should have been obvious - David Gerard (talk) 11:55, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Somebody doing their job and expecting some kind of recognition.   scope_creep Talk  12:54, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability guidelines not met. The Forbes article does not significant independent coverage and there is no other notability. Footlessmouse (talk) 01:01, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Chamber of Digital Commerce: Barely found anything about her. Search results return mostly articles where she's mentioned as the founder of Chamber of Digital Commerce. ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 16:06, 30 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.