Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Permalink

Permalink was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Dicdef. --Yath 19:08, 5 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Looks pretty valid to me. There's history, nuances, links, etc. Quadell (talk) 20:15, Aug 5, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep: Looks pretty good, although I'm not sure the title is universally known.  The concept is well discussed and appropriately placed in context. Geogre 20:36, 5 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep: Well done. The title is universally known in blogs especially.  --G3pro 5 Aug 2004
 * Keep, obviously, but don't give Yath a hard time; it was a dicdef when it was posted here. Salasks 02:03, Aug 6, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Andris 10:52, Aug 6, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep Important WWW concept. Stirling Newberry 06:45, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)