Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Permanence (novel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. TravellingCari 16:25, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Permanence (novel)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No third-party sources; entirely in-universe. Biruitorul Talk 03:04, 4 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep First page of Google News search: Booklist, Library Journal, School Library Journal, Kliatt, Publishers Weekly. Easily clean-up-able. (But not by me: I has teh flu, I r not teh sense-making.) Also won an Aurora Award -- KittyRainbow (talk) 01:12, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  21:02, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - I just added four reliable source reviews to the article that contain sufficient critical commentary to allow the article to grow past a simple plot summary. Which easily allows the article to pass WP:BK.  --Captain-tucker (talk) 00:42, 7 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep per sources recently added. Karanacs (talk) 15:33, 8 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.