Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pero Gil


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 21:17, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Pero Gil

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The only reference of the article is a brief mention of a person named Pero Gil as been part of the expedition. This is not enough to meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG. I tagged the article for notability last November but no new references have been added since. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 08:27, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paraguay-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:52, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 22:33, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, there are insufficient reliable sources that give significant coverage to the subject to pass WP:GNG. No known well known awards awarded to subject, fails WP:ANYBIO. As only a captain, fails WP:SOLDIER.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 21:59, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * delete. I'm not sure that WP:SOLDIER was intended to cover 16th Century conquistadors! But nonetheless I can't find the significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject that we look for, even in Google books. I would tentatively suggest a redirect to Pedro de Mendoza but he is not mentioned there. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:19, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.