Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perplexicism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted  per G1 by. Non-admin closure. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 15:27, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Perplexicism

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article has been speedied as a hoax; however as a philosophy it is plausible enough to avoid a G3 speedy. However, it is a philosophy with no evidence of coverage in reliable third-party sources, and as such fails our inclusion guidelines. Delete.  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 01:12, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete – I question the truthfulness of the article's subject. Even if it is not a hoax, it fails WP:GNG by far. -- Bryce  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 01:43, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * It's probably a kid giving a name to his own way of thinking. It might catch on someday, but until then it doesn't belong here. --  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 01:50, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Agreed. I was going to vote Speedy Delete as hoax when I read that it was plausible enough to avoid a G3. -- Bryce  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 01:54, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Google shows no coverage at all. Non-notable neologism as a title for original research and pretty much just something made up one day.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  01:48, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Intoronto1125 Talk Contributions   02:07, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete – No coverage, probably made up content Jean (talk – contribs) 03:21, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, hoax, invented. Hairhorn (talk) 03:30, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete following Cullen's rationale. Sparthorse (talk) 06:28, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Legis (talk - contribs) 06:59, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.