Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perry Welman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW  MBisanz  talk 00:22, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Perry Welman

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is a young artist with limited notablity at this time. The only references appear to be word-of-mouth, and therefore not reliable. In order for this to even be considered an accpetable article, it would need to be edited down to a stub. It's essentially about one work. However, the references at this point are not verifiable.  freshacconci  talk talk  19:26, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  — freshacconci  talk talk  19:28, 9 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable yet... the only entry on Google is the Wiki article itself!  Teapot  george Talk  19:47, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete not ready for an encyclopedic entry....Modernist (talk) 22:16, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete unless additional sources and grounds for notability can be established.Vartanza (talk) 04:58, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, it doesn't reach notabilty level for Wikipedia and very much looks to be self written. Where did all this info come from? It doesn't look to have come from a third party source.-- Arty pants, Babble 15:19, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - promotional tone could be fixed, but no independent source, nor can I find any. JohnCD (talk) 16:12, 12 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.