Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Persian Toon (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The weight of argument appears to support deletion. The sole keep vote was responded to with respect to in depth referencing and did not reply in turn. Two relists is enough. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:46, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Persian Toon
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable and (now) closed media channel. Only source is Facebook and self website. Previous AfD relisted 3 times attended by 2 real editors and closed as no consensus. Since then it remained permanent stub and now the channel no longer exist, no more anything to get about it &thinsp;&mdash; Ammarpad (talk) 15:07, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. &thinsp;&mdash; Ammarpad (talk) 15:19, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. &thinsp;&mdash; Ammarpad (talk) 15:21, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. &thinsp;&mdash; Ammarpad (talk) 15:21, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep There are references in the edit history .   WP:BEFORE D1 for Google news indicates a possible source from digizone.cz dated 15 Sep 2016, and one from yjc.ir dated 14 Dec 2016.  That is without a Persian language search.  Notability is not temporary, WP:NTEMP, so being out of business means nothing.  Unscintillating (talk) 23:37, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
 * These two sources of Launching the channel cannot establish notability as per as we defer our reasons to WP:GNG which requires "significant coverage" and WP:BCAST which requires "significant coverage" and having broad regional or national audience. (That's for the channels that even still exists). Before I filed this AfD I had gone through these sources all of of them. Let us see their contents. 1. The first source in Czech gave story of "launching" with headline "Persian Toon - a new children's channel on 13E". The second source in Russian gave news more on the satellite 'Hot Bird 13E' than on the subject of this article with the headline. "On the Hot Bird 13A will soon be a channel for children Farsi". The 3rd and last source is the channels' website which is no longer working like it's owners. Further information, this channel existed for only 3 years 2012–2015 and then folded. The Parsi version of the article is a shadow of this one because it is completely unsourced and permanent stub too. &thinsp;&mdash; Ammarpad (talk) 11:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Addendum: I can't find any reliable news from "yjc.ir" and "digizone.cz" in 2016 as you said, please help us with their contents, I am ready to change my mind once it is obvious this short-lived, defunct channel passes WP:GNG and WP:BCAST. Also there are no Parsi sources with anything more than that news of launching, the Parsi version of the article linked above already testify to that. &thinsp;&mdash; Ammarpad (talk) 11:54, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (talk) 16:01, 13 November 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete -- an unremarkable TV channel with no sources to meet WP:CORPDEPTH / WP:GNG. Coverage is routine / WP:SPIP / passing mentions. Such channels are routinely deleted. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:47, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   20:58, 20 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.