Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Persijn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Moves can be discussed or done boldly. Killiondude (talk) 07:00, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Persijn

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The references merely lump together some persons with the same last name, none of which have their own WP entry. If the knight is notable, he could have his own article, but as an article on the family Persijn, it fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTGENEALOGY.  P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:22, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 16:46, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 16:46, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak Keep These is some sourcing on the family - e.g.   Up until 1282 or 1274  the family controlled the lordship of Waterlands.Icewhiz (talk) 09:23, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 23:02, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - the article seems to pass the deletion policy regarding names and surnames.--Rpclod (talk) 03:13, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep and move to Persijn family per Icewhiz's sources. feminist (talk) 03:42, 26 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.