Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Personal Cinema

Article Personal Cinema listed on WP:VFD July 6 to July 14 2004, consensus (barring anonymous votes which do not count towards consensus) was to delete. Discussion:

Oh, joy! Rapture! Another ad! - Lucky 6.9 04:19, 6 Jul 2004 (UTC)


 * Lucky: Hey, I'm sorry if you see it that way. I added the site because it is a description of an organization that is doing some really exciting work with artistic adaptations of video games.  Here are some further URLs that you can peruse to see what I'm talking about.  Perhaps you read one of the earlier drafts without seeing where it was going? User: Andy 6 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * http://www.balkanwars.net
 * http://www.lightdominion.com/VideoShow/video_show.htm
 * http://www.artcontext.org/shows/press/spain/2004/
 * http://www.personalcinema.net/wargame/


 * Wrong! This is totally germane to the category Artistic_computer_game_modification unsigned comment from User:66.114.67.118, who is both the creator of the article and the author of the comments signed "Andy"


 * Looks like personal promotion. No evidence of any notability. Delete. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 04:45, 6 Jul 2004 (UTC)


 * The work shown in Madrid and more recently at the City Museum of Skopje, Macedonia, is more interesting than the game-patch work that was shown in this year's Whitney Biennial. Suppress this if you like, but I'm sure it belongs here. Andy


 * Aw, nuts. Why am I the only guy that gets called out on these things?  Andy, Cyrius has it right.  There has to be a certain degree of notability to be included here.  It's subjective, to be sure, but the line has to be drawn somewhere.  And, there has to be a certain degree of encyclopedic content with history, usage, impact and the like.  What you've written comes off as an ad.  Ironically, this may not help your cause since this is an ongoing general reference work, not an advertising repository.  Nothing personal, and I wish you luck with your project one way or the other. - Lucky 6.9 05:01, 6 Jul 2004 (UTC)


 * Google doesn't turn up anything that marks it as encyclopedic to me. Nifty project idea, but I still vote to delete. Mindspillage 05:44, 6 Jul 2004 (UTC)


 * I've refined the historical aspects of the entry, in case anyone wants to review. I wasn't aware that Google was the arbiter of history.  The Greeks will certainly be amused to learn that!
 * http://www.balkanwars.net/press.htm
 * http://www.balkanwars.net/context.htm unsigned comment from User:66.114.67.118


 * This still reads like a press release. Unless it rewritten, delete.  Morwen - Talk 08:28, 6 Jul 2004 (UTC)


 * Thou dost protesteth too much. Delete. Ambivalenthysteria 09:32, 6 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - advert - good luck - T&#949;x  &#964;  ur&#949;  17:10, 6 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * As Terry Pratchett once said: oh deary deary me. Delete -- Graham  &#9786; | Talk 02:02, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * I am sure that it is a difficult matter to choose what is knowledge and what is not. I like the "google" empiricism this is the right way to search for the truth of the linguistic networks .Great work -- Do not delete -- alex
 * Which was the only edit by anon user 212.205.210.207 contribs -- Graham &#9786; | Talk 21:11, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)