Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Personal injury service


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Personal injury lawyer. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:17, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Personal injury service

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No references x 3 months since tagging. Vaguely related to lawsuits or legal processes, but WP:CRITERIA requires Recognizability, Naturalness, Precision, Conciseness, Consistency. Law firm and Legal advice can/should cover the subject. – S. Rich (talk) 01:30, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 16:23, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 16:23, 23 December 2013 (UTC)


 * This term does appear in a number of books: . I think it must at least be a plausible redirect. James500 (talk) 17:21, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the suggestion. How about a redirect to Personal injury lawyer? (I wish I had thought of that before, a WP:BLAR would work nicely.) Regarding the sources, #1 mentions PIS as a sub-type of legal services. #2 talks about advertising done by PI lawyers. #3 is congressional committee hearing testimony regarding a comparison of worker's comp & PI. The 4th source (Jane Bryant Quinn) is not a use of the term in this context. It refers to a insurance industry based computer program called "Colossus" which analyzes data related to personal injury lawsuits to "value" particular PI cases in terms of settlement or potential jury verdict. (And, James, thanks for the excellent research!) – S. Rich (talk) 17:50, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I think that a redirect to Personal injury lawyer would be appropriate. I can't think of a better target. James500 (talk) 18:24, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.