Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perspective (Rick Nelson album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep — withdrawn‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Nominating rationale and other concerns no longer apply after recent changes. (non-admin closure) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:02, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Perspective (Rick Nelson album)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This is a contested draftification. No claim to notability per WP:NALBUM. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:53, 10 October 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:12, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs, Music,  and United States of America. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:53, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Delete  as nominator. Searches of all the usual databases turned up nothing that would merit keeping. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:59, 10 October 2023 (UTC) (striking duplicate vote, your deletion nomination is your Delete vote Liz Read! Talk! 03:28, 17 October 2023 (UTC))
 * Draftify - Does not satisfy musical notability. The only reference is Allmusic, which is not a secondary source.  Draftification will give the originator six months to find real sources if they exist.  Robert McClenon (talk) 04:40, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: The article was previously draftified. The creator moved it back to the main space within two hours without making changes to improve the article's quality. Significa liberdade (talk) 13:42, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:NMUSIC Not all albums are notable. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:09, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets WP:NALBUM.
 * AllMusic staff review (Published reviews of creative works are considered secondary sources)
 * SIGCOV of the album in Randy Newman's American Dreams published by ECW Press.
 * &mdash;siro&chi;o 08:45, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I think I saw this source when I was searching as well, and would not call this significant coverage. Reading into it in more detail now, there's only one paragraph about the album, and it's used more as a comparison against the work of Harry Nilsson, who's the main focus of the chapter. I don't think this is enough to meet NALBUM. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 13:44, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep Meets GNG with the following significant coverage:
 * These sources provide significant critical commentary and historical context. In combination with the Allmusic review this meets the GNG standard. Jfire (talk) 05:57, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for doing that research, Jfire! I think now that the subject has been shown to pass notability standards it would be better to draftify per the outcomes at Articles for deletion/Country Fever and Articles for deletion/Bright Lights and Country Music (Rick Nelson album), which are by the same page creator. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 14:25, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
 * No need to draftify. I've expanded the article using these sources. Jfire (talk) 03:24, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Awesome, thanks so much for your work on that! Since I believe all the concerns I and other editors have mentioned should be fixed now, I'm willing to withdraw. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:01, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for doing that research, Jfire! I think now that the subject has been shown to pass notability standards it would be better to draftify per the outcomes at Articles for deletion/Country Fever and Articles for deletion/Bright Lights and Country Music (Rick Nelson album), which are by the same page creator. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 14:25, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
 * No need to draftify. I've expanded the article using these sources. Jfire (talk) 03:24, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Awesome, thanks so much for your work on that! Since I believe all the concerns I and other editors have mentioned should be fixed now, I'm willing to withdraw. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:01, 18 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep: with the new sources cited above, it's a keep. Oaktree b (talk) 13:36, 17 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.