Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peru–Philippines relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  MBisanz  talk 22:40, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Peru–Philippines relations

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:GNG. this article is based on one presidential meeting with the usual want to cooperate more statements but no evidence of this happening. In fact the last statement of the article contradicts this by saying Spanish was not included in Phillipines curriculum despite the presidents talking about it. Neither country has a resident embassy. LibStar (talk) 14:17, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment, what was the relation during colonial times? What role did Peru play in the Spanish-American war? --Soman (talk) 23:57, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 05:32, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 05:32, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 05:32, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 23:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - Challenges of these sort of X-Y bilateral relations articles are tiresome. Both of these countries are connected in the past by common affiliation with the Spanish empire; both of these countries are connected in the present by ongoing struggles against Maoist insurgencies AS THIS ARTICLE DEMONSTRATES. The population of the PI is almost 98.4 million people (until Duterte's death squads knock a million off that total but that's another story), we are not talking about the Marshall Islands or the Maldives here. The population of Peru is nearly 30.4 million people, we are not talking about Belize here. The countries MAINTAIN EMBASSIES with one another. These are large, significant nations each with their own foreign relations history and a bilateral relations history. Clear keep here and a trout for the nominator. Carrite (talk) 21:09, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
 * the link provided shows a consulate not embassy. Always helpful to actually read links provided. LibStar (talk) 22:27, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
 * and Peru maintains no embassy in Manila. your claim about maintaining embassies is false and misleading. a clear trout to you. Population size is not a determinant of notability, what is a determinant is significant coverage of actual relations. this article on maoist isn't even about actual bilateral relations, it's pure synthesis on your part. clear trout to you, fake arguments for keep are tiresome.  LibStar (talk) 06:58, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak delete – Since the relations between Peru and the Philippines are quite minimal, with tourists between two countries having only fewest visitors, in which more than 9000 miles apart over a dozen of stops. ApprenticeFan  work 15:42, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:31, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep, as could be assumed, there was significant contact and trade during the colonial era. There is probably more material to be added on military conflict, such as Philippines served as Spanish military base during 19th century armed conflicts in South America (see https://books.google.com/books?id=gVLMWnDjgIoC&pg=PA238 ) for example. --Soman (talk) 11:10, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep at this time as there's sufficient for a current article. SwisterTwister   talk  06:12, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Appropriate reliable and verifiable sourcing to establish notability as a standalone article. Alansohn (talk) 16:59, 26 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.