Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peruvian Constitution


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Merged to Constitution of Peru. PeaceNT 06:42, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Peruvian Constitution

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

1. There is already an article at Constitution of Peru, which is generally how we title such documents

2. The Constitution that this article is about is no longer the Constitution of Peru. There's a newer one. This is about the short-lived 1979-1992 Constitution, which is void.

3. Some of the article is still in Spanish and all of it was horribly translated. Descendall 22:13, 23 February 2007 (UTC) Speedy close as Redirect to Constitution of Peru - since merge to Constitution of Peru has been executed. --Richard 00:03, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep with caveats. These caveats being that the article is renamed in some way to reflect that this Constitution lasted from 79-92 (which doesn't seem overly short-lived to me, but perhaps Peruvian politics is a different kettle of fish), the significance of the Constitution is expounded upon (why was it promulgated in 79? Why was it replaced in 92?) and the translation improved. As the Constitution of a sovereign country, it would appear to be notable, even if it no longer is in force. If someone with more experience in these matters can demonstrate that it was an unremarkable document, I'll reconsider my opinion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 22:34, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge to Constitution of Peru. I assume that from 1979 to 1992 this document was the supreme law of Peru, which to me confers notability automatically. Constitution of Peru should be expanded to serve as a history of all iterations of the document. Otto4711 22:43, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge as given the size there is no reason for separate articles. If split in future naming should be e.g. Constitution of Peru (1979). But Constitution of Peru should serve as a history of all Peruvian Constitutions. --Dhartung | Talk 23:07, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Merged per Otto4711 and Dhartung. I was WP:BOLD and performed the merge.  I will work to improve the article using additional external sources and will remove/translate the untranslated content.  -- Black Falcon 23:33, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No content.--Sefringle 06:52, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * There is no content because it has already been merged to Constitution of Peru. -- Black Falcon 19:31, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 'Merge per Otto4711. --MaNeMeBasat 13:01, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.