Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pet sitting


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 11:29, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Pet sitting

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Not a very encyclopedic entry, and poorly written. Looks to have been created and updated mostly to advertise certain websites. Watchsmart 14:34, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I suppose that Petsitting should be considered for deletion as well. Watchsmart 15:17, 12 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete unsourced. Reasonable topic for an article, but was existing as a repository for spanm (which I've tried to excise) WilyD 15:24, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Seems like a valid subject.  The text that is there now is not entirely useless or beyond improvement.  Spam links and how-to material could be edited out, leaving a reasonable stub. - Smerdis of Tlön 15:35, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup per Smerdis; needs a complete rewrite to remove POV and guidebook content and add sources. It's a legitimate business with coverage in reliable sources (e.g., CBS). --Muchness 15:42, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep because it is a real job. I stubifyed the article for now, the advert-like stuff has been deleted.--Ioannes Pragensis 15:49, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep after good work by Ioannes. The Rambling Man 16:33, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as rewritten, still a stub, but an ok beginning. SkierRMH 18:18, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep authentic occupation. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  19:50, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is an obvious candidate for improvement, not deletion, and AFD as we all know is not cleanup.  RFerreira 19:35, 14 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.