Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pet tattoo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:48, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Pet tattoo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Zero evidence of notability. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 02:49, 4 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Strong keep - per WP:NRVE and WP:GNG. Topic notability is based upon available sources, rather than the state of sourcing in articles. Evidence of notability includes, but is not limited to:
 * USA Today
 * New York Observer
 * The Baltimore Sun
 * Chicago Tribune
 * Ottawa Sun
 * Daily Mail
 * – NorthAmerica1000 05:27, 4 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - The article could stand to be beefed up, but there is significant coverage of the phenomenon. I'd say it meets notability requirements. Bali88 (talk) 17:51, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep per Northamerica1000 who's found alot of sources, Also AFD isn't for clean up solutions. →Davey 2010→  →Talk to me!→  01:38, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 6 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep per notability demonstrated by Northamerica1000--Coin945 (talk) 19:16, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.