Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petar M. Mitrasinovic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Singu larity  06:37, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Petar M. Mitrasinovic

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article appears to be autobiographical and references are to the author's own papers. Proposed deletion was disputed by author, which is why this is in AfD. Dr. Mitrasinovic might be a competent scientist but that does not make him notable enough for Wikipedia. Bardencj 11:54, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia is not a place to post one's CV. 75.184.84.89 13:20, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:PROF. Moreover, a quick google search shows up only a few hits for this scientist. It is also impossible to verify the contents of this article from reliable sources as well. -- S iva1979 Talk to me 14:33, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Subject has published scholarly articles in top journals. Article does read like a resume, though.--Sethacus 15:48, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete per nom. Also, with the article now being blanked several times, there may be some real WP:COI issues. --Evb-wiki 15:56, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete, per WP:CSD, no attestation of WP:N. Nen  yedi  • (Deeds•Talk) 16:33, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep this article This article is not autobigrphical and deserves to stay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stelarios (talk • contribs) — Stelarios (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Weak delete. Associate Professor with no international awards; no textbooks; Google Scholar finds around 10 articles authored by him: although several are in high-quality specialist journals, they do not appear to have been widely cited. A scientist with a PhD in 2002 would have to have achieved something special to meet WP:PROF, and I do not believe that this is the case at this time. However, this is not my subject area, and I'm willing to change my mind if anyone presents additional evidence. Espresso Addict 17:52, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:PROF. ¿SFGi Д nts!  ¿Complain! ¿Analyze! ¿Review! 20:38, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:PROF clearly Harlowraman 03:51, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions.   —David Eppstein 14:41, 19 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.