Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petaurista mechukaensis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  20:02, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Petaurista mechukaensis

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The species does not appear to have been formally described with a type designation or published in a peer-reviewed journal of standing. In the 5 years since this supposed description, there is no other major taxonomic database that includes the species. No hits on Google Scholar either. Also see Petaurista mishmiensis. Shyamal (talk) 04:32, 14 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Support vide lack of minimum notability guidelines for WP:TOL taxon, ie no valid taxonomic description. AshLin (talk) 04:34, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  Lady  of  Shalott  19:19, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Lady  of  Shalott  19:21, 14 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per Shyamal. -- 202.124.72.148 (talk) 00:18, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 16 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Even if I could find the journal it was published in, I doubt very much that it was a valid description. Delete per nom. Rkitko (talk) 22:18, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.