Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pete Fry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:50, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Pete Fry

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Minimally sourced WP:BLP of a person notable only as a non-winning electoral candidate. This is not a claim of notability that gets a person into Wikipedia in and of itself, per WP:NPOL — if you cannot demonstrate and properly source that he was already eligible for a Wikipedia article for some other reason independent of his candidacy, then he does not become eligible for an article until he wins the election. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 19:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 19:13, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 19:13, 9 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails our Notability guideline for politicians as an unelected political candidate. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  22:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per Cullen. 207.102.255.107 (talk) 23:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Nom.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:42, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - This individual appears to be barely notable, with no particular reason that I can see for this article to be kept. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 05:35, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nomination. -- Hybris1984 (talk) 10:42, 16 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.