Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pete Ingram


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:09, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Pete Ingram

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable bass player. Fails WP:MUSIC, no independent sources, no references other than his band's website and myspace. Mr Senseless (talk) 00:06, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Additional articles:
 * Black summer suicide —Preceding unsigned comment added by Esanchez7587 (talk • contribs) 02:49, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Delete The band he is in is even not notable enough to have its own article. It is not judicious for the bass player of the band, who seems to not have done anything else, to have his own article. Parent5446(Murder me for my actions) 00:22, 21 February 2008 (UTC)


 * He was also in the band Sanity which ws featured in the movie Penny Dreadful. They have a nationally Televised Music Video —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chopperdudep (talk • contribs) 00:27, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, apparently that band does not have its own article either. In addition, the article for Penny Dreadful does not make any mention about "Sanity" (the band). So unless all three of the following conditions happen in the next week or so, I doubt the article will survive: 1) the Penny Dreadful (film) article is edited to include a mention of the band (with a source), 2) the Sanity (band) and/or Black Summer Suicide band gets their own article(s) and 3) the members of the band become important enough to get their own article. Good luck! Parent5446(Murder me for my actions) 00:38, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah, in addition, this version of the article is a re-creation of a deleted article which was deleted just hours ago due to WP:CSD (for those who do not have CSD memorized, that means the article failed to assert notability). Just to anticipate any arguments, I know that asserting notability and notability itself are not necessarily related, but in this case I would think otherwise, as it is like the many other bands around the world who want their say on Wikipedia. Parent5446(Murder me for my actions) 00:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)


 * May I also add that the editor who contested my comment happened to be the main contributor (in fact, the only real contributor) to the article in question. Parent5446(Murder me for my actions) 00:45, 21 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. No evidence of notability. It would make sense to have the band listed on Wiki first. And the band would stand a better chance of having their notability established if their record label was notable. This looks like a non-starter.  SilkTork  *What's YOUR point? 00:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of the musician's notability. Aramgar (talk) 01:10, 21 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, fails WP:MUSIC. The editor has taken your suggestion by creating an article on one of this person's bands at Black Summer Suicide, which also fails WP:MUSIC and WP:BAND. One appearance on a cable tv show and being a member of a professional organization do not bring notability to a person. Redfarmer (talk) 01:12, 21 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I have searched on Google News archives and in a library database of newspaper and magazine articles and have found no sources to add. Delete. -- Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 03:52, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, no evidence of the musician's notability. Esradekan (talk) 11:23, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article fails WP:RS and WP:N. Cloudz679 (talk) 14:11, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

I added two more resources Chopperdudep (talk) 18:38, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * You added club listings. Unfortunately that does not help to establish notability according to WP:MUSIC. -- Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 18:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. coverage isn't substantial enough to be considered notable. -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 21:46, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

C'mon why cant you just leave it be, you guys give no chance to promote an up and coming band. They are on the verge of making it big. Honestly, im not trying to be a jerk but why does it have to be deleted? Chopperdudep (talk) 14:40, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not a promotional avenue of any kind. Mr Senseless (talk) 16:08, 26 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Article fails to establish notability, lacks references or sources to bolster that claim. A google search on Pete Ingram with additional searches for any awards, coverage, etc. failed to turn up anything relating to the subject. Ozgod (talk) 17:02, 26 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.