Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pete V. Domenici United States Courthouse

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. Paul August &#9742; 01:24, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

Pete V. Domenici United States Courthouse
nn courthouse Delete --Aranda56 01:39, 18 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep, courthouses seem inherently notable, and it seems like it is the district headquarters for all of New Mexico. -GregAsche (talk) 02:02, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as per GregAsche. Chick Bowen 03:35, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per GregAsche. --TM (talk) 03:47, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong keep - U.S. Federal courthouses are definitely notable. I can't say the same for every town or county courthouse, but on this score I'm quite confident. -- BD2412 talk 04:19, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
 * I whould change my vote if at least 2 signifacent cases have happened in the courthouse which so far havent seen any. Unless 2 of them happened there my vote stays --Aranda56 19:59, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. All courthouses are inherently notable.--Nicodemus75 10:38, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, part of judiciary institution and landmark in Albuquerque, New Mexico --Vsion 11:40, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, the 10th tallest building in Albuquerque. Kappa 12:32, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Random federal courthouses are certainly not notable. The article adds nothing to information about US law that we already have. / Peter Isotalo 16:35, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep all Federal courthouses. -- DS1953 16:43, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep if I can trust the assertions by GregAsche and Kappa, this is both the district headquarters for all of New Mexico and the tenth tallest building in Albuquerque. That's enough notability for me. - Mgm|(talk) 22:03, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
 * I'm going by what the article says. Kappa 22:14, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
 * I provided a source for my statement, check my vote. -GregAsche (talk) 00:28, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. — Phil Welch 22:48, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Philwelch, DS1953 and others. --WikiFanaticTalk Contribs 18:56, 18 Sep 2005 (CDT)
 * Keep. Courthouses are at least more notable than high schools. Sjakkalle (Check!)  07:34, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Public buildings, such as courthouses, are worth including, even if they are of very limited interest. Dottore So 15:37, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep ··gracefool |&#9786; 07:35, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.