Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pete Williams (entrepreneur)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Davewild (talk) 07:51, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Pete Williams (entrepreneur)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional and non-notable. Of his 4 books, the one most widely held is in only 32 libraries a/c/ worldcat, despite being published by a major publisher. The others are self published by his own company. His awards are minor--regional only, and none of them first place. He owns no notable company, nor is he ceo of any,nor has he started any.

Despite what the lede says, he did not sell the MCC for $500. According to the text of the article and the references, what he sold was pieces of its old removed carpeting.

The refs, as expected, are straight PR. We don't have to add to that.,  DGG ( talk ) 20:45, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  21:38, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  21:38, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete per nom and DGG. Pax 07:05, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 01:18, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:35, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:35, 9 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom; torn down or renovated stadiums sell off old infrastructure all the time through their teams; the only difference here was MCG licensed this guy to sell it rather than going direct. Anyone could do that.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 15:46, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.