Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pete Wright (Professional Gamer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete non-notable --Stephen 09:27, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Pete Wright (Professional Gamer)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Aside from the obvious style and conflict of interest issues (having apparently been written by the subject of the article himself), notability seems questionable; while the gaming team Birmingham Salvo does have a WP article and sufficient coverage to satisfy WP:V, individual members do not; sources go no further than a couple of mentions by name in the Metro and Mirror as far as I can tell. ~Matticus UC 12:27, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - subject not notable except for this membership of a gaming team, so should only be mentioned within Birmingham Salvo - Fritzpoll (talk) 13:02, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I'd say merge with the Birmingham Salvo article, but there isn't anything there worth merging. Alberon (talk) 13:35, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete and "Birmingham Salvo" is marginal at best, although that's another issue. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:43, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Birmingham Salvo would be fine for now. There are not enough reliable sources available to warrant a separate article at this time. RFerreira (talk) 23:21, 26 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.