Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Aman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 15:16, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Peter Aman

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article about a political figure notable only as a non-winning candidate for mayor of a city. As always, candidates do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates -- the notability test for politicians is holding a notable office, not just running for one, and a candidate must either (a) demonstrate that he already had preexisting notability for other reasons, or (b) show a credible reason why his candidacy should be seen as much more special than most other people's candidacies. But this demonstrates neither of those things, and is referenced entirely to a mixture of primary sources that aren't support for notability at all (his own LinkedIn, the county elections office) with the purely run of the mill volume and depth local coverage that any mayoral candidate would merely be expected to have in their local media. Nothing here is "inherently" notable at all. Bearcat (talk) 13:22, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Georgia (U.S. state). Bearcat (talk) 13:22, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete failed political candidate, routine employment history otherwise. Oaktree b (talk) 14:16, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete did not win the 2017 Atlanta mayoral election. Coverage does not indicate anything special or unique about his candidacy. --Enos733 (talk) 15:54, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: As User Enos733 said, not notable as he didn't win the election. Contributor008 (talk) 09:42, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:NPOL outright. The article also fails WP:GNG. There was some significant coverage in Creative Loafing and the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, both of which did go into some detail about him, but outside of those two pieces I can't find any significant third-party coverage, and WP:GNG requires multiple of such references; two doesn't cut it. When you take into account that these are routine candidate pieces from local news sources during an election cycle, it further diminishes the significance of these two references. Per Run-of-the-mill, this coverage is routine and to be expected, and is not something that shows notability. - Aoidh (talk) 09:36, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete It has fail GNG. Gurin Hawa Mota (talk) 11:47, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with the nomination and all the delete comments. Fifthapril (talk) 18:42, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, Per above, not notable. Alex-h (talk) 17:05, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:SNOW Lightburst (talk) 00:33, 9 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.