Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Bain (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. KTC (talk) 13:52, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Peter Bain
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article on a minimally-notable executive written by an undisclosed paid editor (or one indistinguishable from such, judging from other deleted contributions). Those references that are independent, when they even mention the article subject, are (like this article) long on puffery, short on actual substance. See also. &mdash;Cryptic 16:14, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:39, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:39, 15 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:GNG executive of non notable company Old Mutual Asset Management. Theroadislong (talk) 16:55, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 * It's apparently either Old Mutual or a subdivision of it. Hard to tell through the doublespeak. &mdash;Cryptic 17:18, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. Nothing of substance written about him, just press releases and other trash. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:21, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Lacks significant coverage to establish notability. This Baltimore Sun article is the best source, and it really is just routine business news. -- Whpq (talk) 20:40, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Sources not independent, no significant coverage.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  05:28, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.