Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Baldrachi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   '''Reclose. Deleted with only nominator comment after a fortnight, now disputed, so restoring as if it were a contested PROD. No prejudice against a further nomination.'''. Courcelles 03:17, 19 December 2010 (UTC) 
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 01:00, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Peter Baldrachi

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

I've just declined a speedy because there seems to be a credible claim of significance, based on the refs. But I think some more eyes are needed to properly determine if he's notable or not. —S MALL JIM   11:26, 29 November 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:54, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:57, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'll go first then, as nominator. After doing further research on this, I don't think anyone can claim that he satisfies any of the conditions of WP:BAND except perhaps for the first (multiple, non-trivial, mentions in reliable, independent sources). And I don't think he satisfies that either - of the refs cited in the article (and I've not been able to find any significant others), only The Big Takeover review would seem to satisfy the above conditions (it appears to be online on the Amazon page - it's not very long). The fact that his album is listed on allmusic, but there's no review or bio is also not in his favour, I think. —S MALL  JIM   17:59, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.