Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Buhr


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 19:42, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Peter Buhr

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Reason Le petit fromage (talk) 05:26, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

BLP of an unnotable US associate professor. I cannot see how writing an obscure programming language makes someone notable in the absence of independent 3rd party sources, etc, etc. Le petit fromage (talk) 05:26, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:44, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:44, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:44, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Actually he is from Canada. I don't know why you mentioned the US. Askold (talk) 19:57, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Whatever - it's not important for the inclusion criteria. Le petit fromage (talk) 09:59, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:52, 14 May 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:35, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - can't find anything to support GNG —Мандичка YO 😜 06:48, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. A little short of the bar for WP:PROF, I think, in a high-citation field. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:29, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.