Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter C. Bradford


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedily deleted (G7, author requested) by Nja247. Non-admin closure. Deor (talk) 13:39, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Peter C. Bradford

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable attorney. Flunks WP:BIO. Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED from his barely notable client. THF (talk) 22:02, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Unless a demonstration of notability by a reliable source can be found. Chillum  22:08, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  —THF (talk) 22:16, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.  —THF (talk) 22:16, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Guantanamo Bay detainment camp-related deletion discussions.  —Geo Swan (talk) 22:41, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, notability is not inherited. Ariticle also looks like a WP:COATRACK for another issue. See also WP:BLP1E. -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 23:53, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * What the heck was I thinking? -- I started this article. That was about fifteen months ago.  Why did I start it?  I don't actually remember.  I think I must have just finished transcribing a memo Lieutenant Bradford wrote -- Legal sufficiency review of Combatant Status Review Tribunal for Detainee ISN 940 (2005-01-25).  This is an interesting memo.  It is the only memo I have come across that showed a CSR Tribunal had reached a split decision.  I must have thought I would come across additional documents by Bradford, or about Bradford.  I was clearly wrong.  As the sole author of the intellectual content of this article I would like to save the time of others and bring this discussion to a quick close by putting a db-author on the article.  FWIW, My mistake fifteen months ago was a good faith mistake.  Geo Swan (talk) 07:34, 9 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.