Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Catanzariti


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 13:21, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Peter Catanzariti

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete. Political staffer, non-notable under WP:POLITICIAN and every other test. WWGB (talk) 11:28, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.   —WWGB (talk) 11:32, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable under WP:POLITICIAN with WP:COATRACK issues. -- Mattinbgn\talk 11:52, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn per above.--Sting  Buzz Me...   13:02, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable and implied interference with police investigation is possibly libelous.--Grahame (talk) 14:28, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 16:47, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 16:47, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Merge and delete - WP:POLITICIAN applies to elected officials, which item is relevant? WP:BLP requires cleanup and Coat-rack is an essay - neither give a rationale for deletion. He is noted in National newspapers, not in a trivial way, so how is he nn? My quick search also revealed this Hansard 4 December 1997: which contains a fact not noted in the article. .. who will have egg on their faces when this whole matter has been examined by independent people. I am now requested to go to the privileges committee, which has hired two lawyers: Mr Bernard Gross, QC, and Mr Peter Catanzariti from the small firm called Clayton Utz to assist Mr Gross. - Franca Arena. cygnis insignis 01:17, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Of course, what Arena meant to say, and what the final report confirms, is that the lawyer was in fact Joe Catanzariti. All of which has nothing to do with Peter Catanzariti, who remains non-notable under WP:PEOPLE. I guess Arena was having another "senior moment". WWGB (talk) 06:01, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for clarifying that. I could contend that Arena confused two notable people, at least known to her, but would prefer to keep it simple. By what criteria of PEOPLE, if you agree the POLITICIAN sect is irrelevant, he is mentioned in (somewhat) reliable secondary sources in a non-trivial way. cygnis insignis 06:37, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Other than this reference where else is Catanzariti mentioned in a significant citation? This is just WP:ONEEVENT. WWGB (talk) 06:55, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I couldn't find one; unless they can be found the information should be merged to relevant articles, then the article deleted. If a reader is confused by the multiple or erroneously cited Catanzaritis, they can find this name in the context of the apparent ONEEVENT. cygnis insignis 08:37, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

I am new to this and see that you have a lot of rules ect, but this person is very significant in QLD Politics on a federal level, I only have interview transcripts and my own experiances to go off so far, but the event referenced lead to the downfall of Gary Hardgrave. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jfranklin80 (talk • contribs) 09:18, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete this article seems to be a reporting of a saga. more like WP:NOT. Michellecrisp (talk) 02:16, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable political staffer. --Yeti Hunter (talk) 04:27, 17 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.