Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter DiFronzo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Drmies (talk) 02:16, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Peter DiFronzo

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested prod. No significant claims of notability, outside one conviction. A lot of questionable language in this one - "reputed", "supposedly"; some references appear dubious as well - user-submitted "iReports", blogs. MikeWazowski (talk) 20:40, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 5 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Minor criminal that fails WP:CRIME, information can be added to John DiFronzo. - DonCalo (talk) 17:01, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - A person who appears on any list of the FBI is in my opinion not a minor criminal. FBI dont handle minor criminals. He passes WP:CRIME just barely but still.--BabbaQ (talk) 05:54, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Delete or Redirect to John DiFronzo – Fails WP:CRIME. -- Bryce  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 13:35, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. I agree he just about appears to pass WP:CRIME. Barely. --Legis (talk - contribs) 03:13, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 11:22, 18 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. Google News indicates substantial coverage over a long time period. However I disagree with the suggestion that being mentioned by the FBI implies notability. Pburka (talk) 14:39, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.