Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Ekberg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 06:59, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Peter Ekberg

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article that fails NPROF, NBIO, and GNG. &mdash; Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 17:36, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. &mdash; Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 17:36, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. &mdash; Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 17:36, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. &mdash; Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 17:37, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. &mdash; Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 17:37, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Logic-related deletion discussions. &mdash; Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 17:40, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. &mdash; Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 17:40, 29 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom as non-notable author. This is promotional cruft.  --Lockley (talk) 06:06, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete cannot find any sources that indicated notability. Fails WP:BIO Rogermx (talk)
 * delete He teaches in Gymnasium? High School teachers are not usually notable. The sources on the page do not support at claim of notability. I found none better. Promocruft.Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:55, 6 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.