Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Eldin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep. The consensus is that coverage is sufficient to establish notability. Eluchil404 (talk) 06:38, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Peter Eldin

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Delete. Fails WP:AUTHOR. Note that the absolute number of books published by an author is not a direct measure of notability for WP. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 21:02, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable. I've added some references - mainly reviews of his books. --Colapeninsula (talk) 22:59, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree that this is a notable author, especially when considering the sources added by Colapeninsula, a few of which are detailed reviews of published works he has authored--for example the School Library Journal's review. Lord Arador (talk) 03:33, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Marginally notable author. Large number of books but only sone limited evidence of notability - but probably just just sufficient. Oxy20 (talk) 19:25, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.