Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter England


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. (non-admin closure) Let&#39;srun (talk) 17:06, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Peter England

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Brandpromotion given the poor not reliable source Linkusyr (talk) 16:35, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Fashion, Maharashtra,  and Ireland.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:00, 27 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Weak keep (or failing that, merge/redirect with Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail). The nominator's rationale (promotional text, poor references) are WP:SURMOUNTABLE problems. In my own WP:BEFORE I was able to find and add a number of additional sources (some primary but other independent and seemingly reliable). And I've removed some of the unsupported/quasi-promotional text. In honesty I can't get behind an outright "delete" recommendation (certainly not based on the rationale given in the nom). Guliolopez (talk) 14:01, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep With added sources, I agree with keeping the article. Go4thProsper (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep One of the oldest clothing brands in India having multiple references on reliable sources. Meets WP:SIGCOV. Dalai60 (talk) 05:48, 4 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.