Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Farley-Moore


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:54, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Peter Farley-Moore

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NBIO, no reliable independent sources which give significant attention to him. Sources in article are not independent (e.g. this one and/or don't mention him (e.g. this or this). Fram (talk) 19:13, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Christianity,  and England. Fram (talk) 19:13, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. I found some additional sourcing (i.e. reports of appointments in the Church Times) and added that to Archdeacon of Hackney, but there's no substantial coverage for Farley-Moore himself that I can find.
 * Delete Clear delete on lack of RS coverage. This one fails every measure. Go4thProsper (talk) 01:45, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: per forementioned reasons above. Tumbuka Arch (talk) 11:40, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's nice of the editor to create an article for his parish priest, but it clearly fails WP:NBIO. Zacwill (talk) 03:32, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi Zacwill
 * I created this article about the recently appointed Archdeacon of Hackney not just out of the goodness of my heart! but because it seems to me that most holders of this post (as too other similar ecclesiastical offices) feature in Wiki.
 * However, apart from Who's Who (which understandably is not a favoured source), the Ven. Peter Farley-Moore appears to have done a great job of hiding any light he may (or may not) have under a bushel!
 * Nonetheless, I trust that this biographical article may be kept (at least to allow enough time for Wikipedians to contribute accordingly).
 * Thanking you in advance for your co-operation.
 * Best Primm1234 (talk) 20:08, 4 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.