Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Fitzgerald (journalist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:45, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Peter Fitzgerald (journalist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

BLp of a non-notable sports reporter in australia, who has won no awards, not been covered by any reliable source in any way, made a unique and lasting contribution, etc... Heavily edited apparently by the subject himself. Was deprodded by an Ip. Bali ultimate (talk) 11:15, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:40, 26 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete writer for a local newspaper is insufficient criteria for inclusion on Wikipedia. I could not establish notability through independent sources.  I did what I could to cleanup the article to meet guidelines.  Much of the article is information that fails WP:BLP. -Verdatum (talk) 17:35, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Clearly fails WP:AUTH (which applies to journalists). As a sports reporter for a newspaper with a circulation of about 70,000, I do not consider he is notable in any sense. --Mkativerata (talk) 18:42, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete -- to establish notability, we need to see non-trivial coverage from independent sources. JBsupreme (talk) 11:25, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - lack of independent WP:RS is a clincher SatuSuro 07:28, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.