Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Green (PR manager)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:42, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Peter Green (PR manager)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unreferenced BLP, fails to meet notability guidelines - this person works in PR and has supported a number of notable people, but that does not make the subject himself notable. He has published a number of works through "Rocket Pocket Books" but no information can be found on this publisher through Google which leaves to me believe they are all self published. Given the fawning POV tone such as "he is held in very high regard by the fans" I'm even tempted to think there is some autobiographical / COI content in this article. Bottom line - I don't think it adds value to Wikipedia. Biker Biker (talk) 22:39, 17 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - the books are self published, otherwise the article might have nosed over the threshold for notability. If this isn't self promotion, it was written by someone with a connection to the subject.  Sea photo Talk  00:07, 18 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, I can't find any significant coverage. -- Nuujinn (talk) 22:11, 20 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - Coverage is limited to stuff like this which identify him as heading up the fan clubs for Split Enz and Crowded House. But that's not enough to show notability.  Nor was I able to find any indication his writing has recevied notice. -- Whpq (talk) 16:02, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.