Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter J. Zuckerman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 05:48, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Peter J. Zuckerman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:POLITICIAN (local town board), no other evidence of notability, also no references for WP:BLP &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;   &#9743;(talk)  00:13, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  00:48, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 18 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Totally lacking in any sources whatsoever because there just plain aren't any.  I looked.  Subject is a minor local politician and that simply isn't good enough to establish notability without sources.  And though not by itself a reason to delete, I note the article is clearly the work of an WP:SPA, suggesting this may be an WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY.  Msnicki (talk) 02:26, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. Kierzek (talk) 16:15, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Local guy with a local job. TJRC (talk) 18:42, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - It's a clear case of lack of notability. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 19:37, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as no evidence of notability. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  00:17, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NOTABILITY and WP:POLITICIAN --Jersey92 (talk) 01:05, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Municipal councillors are not deemed to pass WP:POLITICIAN in small towns, and the article as written is not reliably sourced enough to deem him a candidate for the WP:GNG bypass. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 03:43, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete North Hempstead is not a big enough place to confer notability on councilors, although with well over 200,000 people, I would hesitate to call it a small town. It's a well developed, significant suburb of New York City.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:32, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.