Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Johnston (negotiator)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 10:15, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Peter Johnston (negotiator)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can't find enough secondary sources on the topic to be convinced that the subject meets the WP:GNG or WP:BIO; in fact, I can't really find any. The article has no sources and reads like a CV or an advertisement, and while those aren't reasons to delete, the lack of available secondary sources makes it impossible to create an acceptable article. -- Rrburke (talk) 20:17, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Article has a promotional tone. While this alone is not a reason for deletion, the tone of this article and lack of sourcing mean it should be deleted. Subject is also not known for anything other than one book, member of WP:BLP1E. Sheepythemouse (talk) 20:25, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 22:41, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 22:45, 15 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Authoring one book does not seem notable enough for stand-alone biography article. Most authors on the book award page Next Generation Indie Book Awards do not have wikipedia bios. If book is notable, then it can be subject of an article and the author can be briefly described in that article. However, there do not seem to be any reliable sources that give feature content of the book and the author. Canuckle (talk) 22:54, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Book appears to be self-published, as "Negotiation Press" has exactly one book in the ISBN database here, and it is this one. Oddly, the name on it there is Peter H. Johnston, not Peter D. In any case, I don't find any obvious sources for him. LaMona (talk) 04:28, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as nothing for better improvements for notability yet, nothing else convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  04:31, 22 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.