Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Kuhlman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  23:31, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Peter Kuhlman

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Kuhlman does not appear to meet notability guidelines. I have found four sources which mention him, but they do not seem a substantial enough body of work to ensure notability: Uffda608 (talk) 14:45, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Two news articles (1 and 2) – These articles quote Kuhlman, but are not about him and only include a sentence referring to him each.
 * A news article about his retirement – This is the source which talks about him in the most detail, but only details his reasons for retirement.
 * A short interview with the Ministry of Education – Kuhlman is quoted at length, but he is not the focus of the article.
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2023 June 8.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 15:02, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Denmark. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:21, 8 June 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.