Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Kuttner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I'm afraid being a class project (if that's the case) is not a sufficient reason for an article to be kept. There has been no work done on the article since nomination to suggest improvements is being attempted. Having said that, if this is indeed work done for a class, I'm willing to userfy it by request later if needed. KTC (talk) 12:22, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Peter Kuttner

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not appear to have the sourcing to meet either WP:GNG or WP:CREATIVE. John from Idegon (talk) 22:42, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    23:40, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    23:40, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    23:40, 2 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete - not even close to meeting WP:CREATIVE, and searches turned up virtually nothing on this person with that name (there was more coverage for an artist and an architect with the same name). Books had some trivial mentions, but he clearly does not pass WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 01:31, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as I simply see nothing better. SwisterTwister   talk  02:20, 3 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep: I think this is being worked on as part of a class project, let's look at the contributors and offer them a hand; there may be more to this than meets the eye.  Montanabw (talk)  04:26, 3 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Snow delete. Not even close to WP:GNG or WP:CREATIVE. By the way, here is his IMDB listing: . Softlavender (talk) 05:25, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment I find a lot of material on a Boston architect by the same name who is not the subject and some passing mentions relating to films which may be the subject. The detail in the article tends to indicate there may be some offline sources. I would like to see the titles of the cites which are simply to ProQuest search . If this is being used as a school project it would be nest to first ask the author on the talk page to list their sources. If they do not post some then I say delete. J bh  Talk  14:17, 3 November 2015 (UTC) ce  J bh  Talk  18:13, 3 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep for limited time only This article seems to be 1 involved in a class project. 146.200.163.2 (talk) 17:32, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Neutral, leaning delete I'm not sure this will meet the GNG. There are a few sources out there not cited in the article, but I'm not sure how reliable they are (e.g. an interview in a newsletter which is somehow indexed in google scholar). However I'm a bit disheartened at the calls to speedily delete something made in good faith w/ an attempt at sourcing. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:58, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, with a caveat. I don't see and can't find the sourcing needed to make this pass WP:GNG or WP:CREATIVE, and the fact that it looks like a class project doesn't automatically give it a free pass. Nonetheless, while my efforts to find WP:RS were fruitless, there is the off-chance that the collaborative effort of this class might find other sources, so I wouldn't object to seeing this moved to the Draft namespace for the time being. -- Kinu  t/c 18:12, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Being an assistant camera technician in a bunch of films does not quite satisfy WP:GNG criteria. OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:22, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete While he has been involved in many films 'Assistant Camera Operator' and his other roles in the productions are not significant. I can find nothing of significance on this person and the author has provided no indication of offline sources. J bh  Talk  12:32, 4 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.