Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Leo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:59, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Peter Leo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

BLP article about a rapper who is popular in his local area but unknown outside, suggesting that this article exists for publicity. The article was already deleted twice in accordance with WP:CSD. This version has an additional citation or two, but nothing that I'd consider significant, seem to be all small niche publications. Seems to fail WP:MUSICBIO. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:18, 4 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Some coverage in reliable sources including, but not enough to meet WP:GNG and fails WP:MUSICBIO. STATic message me!   21:46, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I am in the process of adding more information to the biography with more citations. I do believe this artist has enough popularity to be included in Wikipedia and the information I add will show this. I ask that you do not delete this page and allow me to edit it further to meet the guidelines. ~Hizeak (talk) 21:55, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, you have a week. Go for it. I'm all for keeping articles that can be brought up to encyclopedic standards. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:22, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:42, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:42, 6 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:59, 14 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - Can't find any coverage and the existing refs are not substantial. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:11, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.