Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter MacGill


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Was relisted, but consensus is now quite clear. (non-admin closure) Cirt (talk) 01:34, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Peter MacGill

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Notability problem. This bio lacks reliable sources to establish sufficient notability and it does not really assert the Mr. MacGill's notability either. Notability is not gained via association to famous artists. The stub also reads somewhat like an advertisement for a business (art gallery). Thank you. HG | Talk 17:12, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  20:30, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Director of the notable partly-eponymous gallery.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 22:14, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article significance has changed radically since the nom was made. Well done, Ethico.  Ty  00:23, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Agreed. I would not have filed the AfD had the 1st sentence and footnote been there. Unless somebody disputes the source, or feels that additional references are needed, over the coming days, I would be quite comfortable with a keep. HG | Talk 15:26, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Locobot (talk) 01:28, 21 May 2009 (UTC) Thor Malmjursson (talk) 00:50, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. Modernist (talk) 16:05, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep, improvements establish notability, seems to be adequate coverage in reliable sources. Out of curiosity, why did this get relisted? Considering nothing but keep votes and a positive response from the nominator, this looks like about as clear as a "keep" AfD is going to get. ~ mazca  t 01:32, 6 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.