Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Mathews (composer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 08:41, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Peter Mathews (composer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There's nothing particularly better here for the applicable notability and my searches have also found nothing noticeably better, nothing to suggest this can be kept and improved as would be needed. SwisterTwister  talk  07:46, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment I'm inclined to agree w/ ST here, though I have found some marginal sourcing (see a newsletter, a trade publication, and a newspaper). There are a few others, but many of them are short mentions. If there are more (especially those which aren't indexed on the net), then the subject may be notable. But I'm not sure what I've found is enough. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:47, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article and above sourcing doesn't pass the general notability threshold—needs more significant coverage than passing mentions. czar  21:53, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:32, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:03, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:03, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  09:18, 7 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.