Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Renner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. @pple complain 07:39, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Peter Renner

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No notion of notability. Fails WP:V as there are no third party sources. All books are self-published. -- ShinmaWa(talk) 22:45, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per Criteria for speedy deletion - Articles - #7. First half of article doesn't state notability for books, while the second half doesn't state person-based or academic-based notability. -- slakr \ talk / 23:48, 6 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 12:34, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. No independent notability asserted. Dean Wormer 22:00, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. If his most notable book is self-published, that doesn't say much. Accounting4Taste 19:01, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.