Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Scott-Morgan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America1000 01:22, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Peter Scott-Morgan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article might not meet notability requirements as per WP:BIO. Tow (talk) 01:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Cites many sources establishing notability. &mdash; Music1201  talk  05:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 00:31, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * (EC with above) Keep perhaps as not my field of interest at all, but this seems to be enough. SwisterTwister   talk  00:31, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  00:32, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  00:32, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  00:32, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  00:32, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * DeleteThe numerous sources listed are mostly reviews of his books or examples of consultant blogs complimenting other consultant blogs. It reads like an advertisement. No mention in reputable sources like Forbes, Business Week, The Wall Street Journal, etc. RockyMtChai (talk) 20:04, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 14:41, 15 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.